Roundup, a widely used weed killer, has become the center of numerous legal battles across the United States. The Roundup lawsuit phenomenon has gained significant attention as thousands of individuals claim that exposure to this herbicide has led to serious health issues, particularly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
These lawsuits allege that Monsanto, the manufacturer of Roundup (now owned by Bayer), failed to adequately warn consumers about the potential risks associated with the product's active ingredient, glyphosate.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with cancer after prolonged Roundup exposure, you may be entitled to compensation.
An experienced Roundup lawsuit attorney can evaluate your case, guide you through the legal process, and fight for your rights against large corporations. Don't face this challenge alone—contact a qualified lawyer today to explore your options and seek the justice you deserve.
Roundup Lawsuits Updates - May 2025
May 2025 - Over 67,000 Roundup Lawsuits Still Unresolved
As of May 2025, Monsanto has resolved nearly 100,000 Roundup-related lawsuits through settlement agreements totaling around $11 billion. These agreements were primarily reached through large-scale settlements with law firms representing numerous plaintiffs and through individual settlements before cases proceeded to trial.
Despite these extensive payouts, roughly 67,000 active cases are still moving through the courts. While most are in various state jurisdictions, over 4,000 lawsuits remain pending in the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) centralized in California.
April 29, 2025 – North Dakota Enacts Industry-Favored Legislation
North Dakota lawmakers have passed a bill that offers legal protection to pesticide manufacturers from future lawsuits, including those involving Roundup. Governor Kelly Armstrong signed House Bill 1318 into law last week, giving companies like Bayer a stronger legal defense if their product labeling meets EPA standards.
This change significantly limits the ability of individuals harmed by pesticides to seek justice, especially in cases tied to failure-to-warn allegations. It’s a major legislative win for Bayer, which has long pushed for this type of shield as it continues to face mounting legal and financial pressure.
The move reflects a broader trend, with similar legislative efforts currently underway in states like Missouri and Georgia. While North Dakota’s action may give Bayer favorable headlines, it stops short of offering full immunity—for now.
April 11, 2025 – New Lawsuits Filed in Federal Roundup MDL
April has seen an increase in filings within the Roundup multidistrict litigation. One recent lawsuit comes from a Mississippi resident who claims decades of Roundup use led to his non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma diagnosis in 2022.
The complaint alleges the herbicide was defectively designed and failed to carry adequate warnings. The plaintiff routinely used glyphosate-based products on his property, unaware of the cancer risks. His legal team argues that Monsanto either knew or should have known about these dangers and still chose not to inform consumers.
The case heavily cites the 2015 World Health Organization classification of glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen. It also argues that safer product formulations were available and that Bayer misrepresented the safety of Roundup. This suit adds to the growing number of personal injury claims against Monsanto related to glyphosate exposure.
April 6, 2025 – Bayer Renews Supreme Court Push
Bayer is again petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court, asking it to rule that federal pesticide regulations preempt state failure-to-warn laws. The company argues that, since the EPA doesn’t require a cancer warning on Roundup, it shouldn’t face state-level liability.
However, this legal theory has already been rejected by the high court, and little has changed since that ruling. While Bayer hopes for intervention, juries continue to side with plaintiffs, and a reversal at this stage appears unlikely.
April 1, 2025 – Roundup MDL Sees Minimal Growth
In March, only a single case was added to the federal Roundup MDL, bringing the total number of pending cases to 4,415. This marks the second consecutive month with minimal activity at the federal level.
Momentum in Roundup litigation has largely shifted to state courts, where high-dollar verdicts have put greater pressure on Bayer to resolve claims.
March 23, 2025 – Jury Awards $2.1 Billion in Georgia Roundup Trial
A Georgia jury has delivered a staggering $2.1 billion verdict against Bayer, including $65 million in compensatory damages and $2 billion in punitive damages. The plaintiff, who developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after prolonged Roundup use, successfully argued that the herbicide’s manufacturer failed to warn about its cancer risk.
Bayer responded by repeating its stance that such verdicts contradict existing science and regulatory reviews—a position that’s increasingly being dismissed by juries across the country. Though the company will likely appeal in an effort to reduce the payout, the massive award underscores the mounting financial risks of continuing to litigate rather than settle.
This verdict adds to Bayer’s growing legal woes. Even after spending $10 billion to resolve earlier claims, tens of thousands of lawsuits remain unresolved—many in state courts where juries have consistently returned large plaintiff awards. Bayer’s current reserve of $5.9 billion for future settlements appears increasingly inadequate.
With this record-breaking judgment, Bayer’s courtroom strategy is under intense scrutiny. At a time when the company is lobbying Congress for legal immunity and warning of pulling Roundup from the market, jurors continue to hold it accountable. The outcome of this case is a clear signal: continuing to resist settlement may only deepen the company’s legal and financial troubles.
Other Developments Regarding Roundup Lawsuits
- October 2024: A Philadelphia jury awarded $78 million to former Roundup users William and Margaret Melissen. William developed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after nearly three decades of Roundup use. The verdict included $3 million in compensatory damages and $75 million in punitive damages.
- August 2024: Bayer achieved a significant legal victory when a federal appeals court ruled that federal law preempted state law claims alleging failure to warn about cancer risks associated with Roundup. This decision could influence future litigation and potentially reduce Bayer's liability in ongoing cases.
Legislative Actions and Regulatory Changes Concerning Glyphosate
- State Legislation Efforts: In 2024, legislative efforts in various states aimed to shield pesticide manufacturers from failure-to-warn lawsuits if their product labels complied with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. While these bills faced opposition and were not enacted, similar legislative initiatives are anticipated in 2025.
- EPA's Position on Glyphosate: The EPA has maintained that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is "not likely to be carcinogenic to humans" when used according to label directions. However, this stance has been challenged in courts, leading to orders for the EPA to reexamine its findings.
These developments underscore the evolving legal and regulatory environment surrounding Roundup and glyphosate. Individuals who believe they have been affected by Roundup exposure should consult with experienced personal injury attorneys to understand their rights and potentially pursuing a Roundup cancer claim.
From Popular Weedkiller to Injuries and Lawsuits
Roundup's journey from a revolutionary weed control solution to the center of massive litigation is a complex tale of scientific innovation, corporate strategy, and evolving health concerns.
Developed by Monsanto in the 1970s, Roundup quickly became a global agricultural staple due to its active ingredient, glyphosate. This herbicide works by inhibiting a crucial enzyme in plants, effectively killing weeds while purportedly leaving crops unharmed. By the 1980s, Roundup had permeated agriculture, forestry, and home gardening sectors, praised for its efficiency and ease of use.
However, Roundup's widespread adoption has led to increased scrutiny over its safety and environmental impact. The lawsuits against Monsanto (now owned by Bayer) primarily allege that prolonged exposure to Roundup causes non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and other serious health issues.
Monsanto, founded in 1901, dominated the herbicide market with Roundup. However, the company's history is marred by controversies, including allegations of:
- Deceptive marketing practices
- Environmental damage
- Aggressive business tactics
- Monopolistic practices in seed markets
- Legal action against farmers for unauthorized seed use, even in cases of natural seed spread
Bayer's acquisition of Monsanto in 2018 transferred these legal challenges to the German pharmaceutical giant. Bayer has since faced significant financial and reputational repercussions due to the ongoing Roundup litigation and adverse verdicts.
The Monsanto Roundup lawsuits are built on growing scientific evidence suggesting a link between glyphosate exposure and cancer, particularly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Plaintiffs argue that Monsanto knew or should have known about these risks but failed to adequately warn consumers.
As the litigation continues, it raises important questions about corporate responsibility, scientific research, and the balance between agricultural productivity and public health. The outcomes of these lawsuits could have far-reaching implications for the agricultural industry, regulatory practices, and consumer safety standards.
Related article: How to File a Lawsuit Against a Company
What Makes Roundup So Dangerous?
Roundup's potential danger primarily stems from its active ingredient, glyphosate, a non-selective herbicide that has become a subject of intense scientific scrutiny and public debate.
Glyphosate inhibits an enzyme essential for plant growth, effectively killing most plants it contacts. While this makes it an efficient weed killer, concerns about its impact on human health and the environment have mounted over the years.
Key factors contributing to the perceived dangers of Roundup include:
- Cancer concerns: The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization, classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans" in 2015. This classification has been a cornerstone of many Roundup lawsuits, with plaintiffs alleging that exposure to the herbicide caused their non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
- Environmental impact: Widespread glyphosate use has raised concerns about its effects on soil microorganisms, water quality, and biodiversity. Some studies suggest it may kill beneficial insects and degrade soil health.
- Herbicide resistance: The extensive use of Roundup has led to the emergence of glyphosate-resistant weeds. This has increased herbicide applications, potentially exacerbating environmental and health risks.
- Regulatory uncertainty: Different regulatory bodies worldwide have reached varying conclusions about glyphosate's safety, creating confusion and concern among consumers. While some countries have banned or restricted its use, others continue to approve it.
- Exposure risks: Roundup's widespread use in agriculture, public spaces, and home gardens increases the potential for human exposure through food, water, and direct contact.
- Alleged corporate misconduct: Lawsuits have accused Monsanto (now Bayer) of downplaying the risks associated with Roundup and manipulating scientific research to favor their product.
The scientific community remains divided on the extent of Roundup's dangers. While some studies suggest links to various health issues, others argue that the product poses minimal risk when used as directed. However, the volume of lawsuits and substantial settlements indicate that courts have found merit in many of the claims against Roundup.
Given the ongoing controversy and potential risks, individuals exposed to Roundup and experienced health issues should consult healthcare professionals and seek legal advice to understand their options.
Research Linking Roundup to Cancer
The potential link between Roundup and cancer has been a focal point of scientific research and legal disputes. While the scientific community remains divided on the extent of the risk and studies of Roundup-related cancer continue, several key studies have contributed to the ongoing debate:
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Report
In 2015, the IARC, a part of the World Health Organization, classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen.
The IARC classified the herbicide based on evidence from human and animal studies. Roundup lawsuits have widely cited the IARC's report, which has significantly influenced public perception of its safety.
Agricultural Health Study (AHS)
This long-term study, funded by the National Cancer Institute and other agencies, has monitored the health of thousands of agricultural workers. An update published in 2018 did not find a statistically significant association between glyphosate use and overall cancer incidence, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, some researchers have questioned the study's methodology and potential biases.
Meta-analyses and Reviews
Several meta-analyses have attempted to synthesize findings from multiple studies. A notable 2019 meta-analysis found high exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides was associated with a 41% increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This analysis incorporated data from multiple case-control studies and the AHS, providing a more comprehensive view of the potential risks.
Animal Studies
Laboratory studies on animals have shown that glyphosate exposure can lead to cancer in rodents, supporting the IARC's classification. However, industry-funded studies have challenged these findings, leading to further debate within the scientific community.
Cellular Studies
Research at the cellular level has suggested that glyphosate may have genotoxic effects, meaning it could damage DNA, which is a potential mechanism for cancer development. However, the relevance of these findings to real-world exposure levels remains a point of contention.
While these studies provide valuable insights, the relationship between Roundup exposure and cancer risk is complex and continues to be debated. Factors such as exposure levels, duration of use, and individual susceptibility may all play roles in determining risk.
The ongoing research and legal proceedings underscore the need for continued investigation into the long-term effects of glyphosate exposure. If you believe Roundup exposure may have injured you, consult healthcare professionals and consider seeking legal advice to understand your options.
The Roundup MDL
The Roundup litigation has taken on massive proportions. In 2016, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated thousands of lawsuits into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the United States Northern District of California. This MDL, presided over by Judge Vince Chhabria, has become a focal point for claims against Monsanto and its parent company, Bayer.
At the heart of these lawsuits is the allegation that glyphosate, the primary ingredient in Roundup, is responsible for causing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and other serious health issues.
While there is ongoing scientific debate about the extent of the risks, plaintiffs' lawyers have grounded the litigation in substantial research and have already obtained significant settlements paid by the defendants.
The MDL process has served several crucial functions:
- Consolidating pretrial matters: This approach streamlines the legal process, making it more efficient for all parties involved.
- Encouraging settlements: The MDL's consolidated nature has facilitated large-scale settlements, resolving many cases without the need for individual trials.
- Establishing precedents: Decisions made within the MDL can influence future cases and negotiations.
In 2020, Bayer announced a settlement agreement of over $10 billion to resolve a significant portion of the Roundup cancer lawsuits. This settlement included $8.8 billion to $9.6 billion to resolve current litigation and $1.25 billion to address potential future litigation.
As the litigation has progressed over the years, the number of federal cases has decreased due to settlements and many plaintiffs opting to file in state courts. However, the federal MDL remains active, and new cases continue to be filed.
While the MDL has been instrumental in handling many cases, individuals who believe they have been harmed by Roundup exposure still have options.
If you're considering legal action, an experienced attorney can explain your rights and the best course of action for your specific situation.
Step-by-Step Guide to Filing a Roundup Cancer Lawsuit
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another form of cancer after exposure to Roundup weed killer, you may be eligible to file a Roundup lawsuit against Monsanto (now owned by Bayer). Filing Roundup lawsuits can help victims seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more. Below is a step-by-step guide to navigating the legal process:
Step 1: Initial Consultation with a Roundup Attorney
The first step in pursuing a Roundup lawsuit settlement claim is to consult an experienced Roundup attorney. During this free consultation, the lawyer will evaluate your case by reviewing:
- The extent of your exposure to Roundup weed killer (e.g., how frequently and in what capacity you used it).
- Your medical diagnosis and treatment history.
- Any potential links between your illness and Roundup weed killer exposure.
Step 2: Gathering Evidence to Support Your Case
To strengthen your claim, you will need to provide key documents and evidence, including:
- Medical Records – A diagnosis of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or other related conditions.
- Proof of Exposure – Documentation of Roundup weed killer use (e.g., employment records, purchase receipts, landscaping contracts, or witness statements).
- Expert Testimonies – Medical experts and scientists may testify regarding the link between Roundup and your cancer diagnosis.
- Personal Testimony – A statement detailing how Roundup exposure affected your health and life.
Step 3: Filing a Roundup Lawsuit
Once your Roundup lawyers have gathered sufficient evidence, they will officially file a Roundup lawsuit on your behalf. Depending on your case, this could be an individual lawsuit or part of a Roundup class action lawsuit.
Step 4: Pre-Trial Discovery and Negotiation
During this phase:
- Both sides exchange evidence and testimonies.
- Your Roundup attorney may negotiate a Roundup lawsuit settlement claim with Bayer’s legal team.
- If a fair Roundup settlement is offered, your attorney will advise you on whether to accept or proceed to trial.
Step 5: Trial or Settlement
- If a Roundup lawsuit settlement is reached, you will receive compensation without going to trial.
- If no agreement is reached, your Roundup lawyers will present your case in court to seek a favorable verdict.
Step 6: Receiving Compensation
If your lawsuit is successful, you may be awarded damages, including:
- Medical expenses (past and future).
- Lost wages or reduced earning capacity.
- Pain and suffering.
- Punitive damages (if the court finds Monsanto acted with egregious negligence).
Legal Fees & Contingency Basis
Most Roundup attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning:
- You do not pay upfront fees.
- Your attorney only gets paid if you win or secure a Roundup settlement.
- The legal fee is typically a percentage of the awarded amount.
What Compensation is Available in a Roundup Lawsuit?
Individuals who have been diagnosed with cancer, particularly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, after exposure to Roundup may be eligible for various types of compensation through a lawsuit.
The specific amount and types of compensation can vary widely depending on the individual circumstances of each case, but generally, plaintiffs may recover:
- Medical Expenses: This can include past and future costs related to cancer treatment, such as chemotherapy, radiation, surgeries, hospital stays, medications, and ongoing care.
- Lost Wages or Income: Compensation for income lost due to the illness, including both past lost wages and potential future earnings if the plaintiff is unable to return to work.
- Pain and Suffering: Non-economic damages to compensate for physical pain and emotional distress caused by the illness and treatment.
- Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Damages for the reduced quality of life resulting from the cancer diagnosis and treatment.
- Punitive Damages: In some cases, courts may award additional damages to punish the defendant (Monsanto/Bayer) for particularly egregious conduct and to deter similar behavior.
- Wrongful Death: In cases where a person has died from cancer allegedly caused by Roundup exposure, their family may be able to pursue compensation for funeral expenses, loss of financial support, and loss of companionship.
The amounts awarded can vary significantly.
Factors that affect compensation amounts include:
- The severity and progression of the plaintiff's cancer
- The strength of evidence linking the plaintiff's cancer to Roundup exposure
- The plaintiff's age and overall health
- The impact of the illness on the plaintiff's life and family
If you believe you may have a case against Monsanto/Bayer related to Roundup exposure, you must consult an experienced Roundup lawsuit lawyer who can evaluate your specific situation and help you understand the potential compensation you might receive.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the deadline for filing a Roundup lawsuit?
The Roundup lawsuit statute of limitations varies by state. Most states require claims to be filed within 2-4 years from the date of diagnosis or discovery of harm. It is crucial to consult a Roundup cancer lawyer as soon as possible to ensure you meet the deadline.
How long does a Roundup lawsuit take?
The timeline varies depending on whether you accept a Roundup lawsuit settlement claim or go to trial. Some cases resolve in a few months, while others take years to litigate. Roundup class action lawsuits and multidistrict litigation (MDL) cases may take longer due to their complexity.
Do I have to go to court if I file a lawsuit?
Not necessarily. Many Roundup lawsuits are settled outside of court. However, if Bayer does not offer a fair Roundup settlement, your Roundup lawyers may advise you to proceed to trial.
Can family members file a claim for a deceased loved one?
Yes, if a loved one passed away due to cancer linked to Roundup weed killer, their family members can file a wrongful death lawsuit. This can help recover compensation for medical bills, funeral costs, lost financial support, and pain and suffering.
What happens if I was exposed years ago?
Even if your Roundup weed killer exposure occurred years ago, you may still be eligible to file a Roundup lawsuit. Courts often consider the date of diagnosis rather than the date of exposure when determining eligibility. Consult a Roundup lawsuit lawyer to assess your options.
If you believe you have a case, don’t wait. You must file a Roundup lawsuit promptly to preserve evidence and protect your rights.
Contact an Experienced Lawyer to Discuss Your Roundup Cancer Case
The Roundup lawsuit controversy continues to evolve, with ongoing scientific research and legal proceedings shaping our understanding of the potential risks associated with this widely used herbicide.
As individuals and families grapple with the health implications of Roundup exposure, stay informed and seek professional guidance when needed.
If doctors diagnosed you or a loved one with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or another form of cancer after Roundup exposure, consult an experienced attorney to protect your rights and seek justice.
Here's how a lawyer can help:
- Case Evaluation: An attorney can review your specific situation, medical records, and exposure history to determine if you have a viable claim.
- Evidence Gathering: Lawyers have the resources and knowledge to collect and analyze scientific evidence, expert testimonies, and other crucial documentation to support your case.
- Navigating Complex Legal Processes: An attorney can guide you through each step of the legal process, from filing your lawsuit to negotiating settlements or representing you in court.
- Maximizing Compensation: Experienced lawyers understand how to calculate and pursue the full range of damages you may be entitled to, including medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
- Timely Action: Monsanto Roundup cancer attorneys are aware of statutes of limitations and can ensure your claim is filed within the required timeframe.
Don't face this challenging situation alone. If you believe you've been affected by Roundup exposure, call 888-984-6195 to connect with a law firm equipped to handle these complex claims or fill out our online form to explore your legal options for seeking the compensation you deserve.