Skip to content
Nationwide Mass Tort and Class Action Lawsuits Logo
  • Active Lawsuits
    • Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) Lawsuit
    • Depo Provera Lawsuit Update – May 2025
    • Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Lawyer
    • NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit
    • Ozempic Lawsuit
    • Paraquat Lawsuit
    • Roundup Lawsuit
    • Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit
    • Tepezza Lawsuit
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Search
Call Now 888-984-6195

EPA Issues Emergency Stop Order for Dacthal Use

Active Lawsuits  >  News  >  EPA Issues Emergency Stop Order for Dacthal Use

January 10, 2025 | By Nationwide Mass Tort and Class Action Lawsuits
EPA Issues Emergency Stop Order for Dacthal Use

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently issued an emergency stop order halting the use of Dacthal, a widely utilized pre-emergent herbicide. This action comes amid rising concerns about the herbicide’s safety, its impact on public health, and the damage it causes to the environment. 

The stop order represents a significant regulatory response to growing evidence linking Dacthal to water contamination, ecosystem harm, and potential health risks, including cancer.

Dacthal, known chemically as dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA), has been a staple for controlling weeds in agricultural, residential, and commercial settings since the 1950s. Despite its longstanding presence in the market, its persistent nature in the environment and its suspected toxicity have made it the subject of regulatory scrutiny.

The EPA's decision creates immediate challenges for communities, farmers, and industries relying on Dacthal. It also opens the door for potential legal actions by those harmed by exposure to Dacthal or its byproducts. This article delves into the EPA’s decision, the health and environmental risks associated with Dacthal, and the legal options available for those affected by its use.

lawsuits-logo

Why did the EPA ban Dacthal, and what are the risks?

The EPA banned Dacthal over concerns about water contamination, environmental harm, and health risks like cancer. Discover how this herbicide impacts public safety and what it means for farmers, communities, and legal accountability.

Schedule A Free Consultation


What Is Dacthal?

Dacthal, or DCPA, is a pre-emergent herbicide primarily used to prevent the growth of weeds before they sprout. It is particularly effective against a wide range of broadleaf and grassy weeds, making it a popular choice for farmers, landscapers, and gardeners. 

The herbicide has been widely used in agricultural fields, residential lawns, golf courses, and commercial landscapes.

Composition and Function

Dacthal works by forming a protective barrier in the soil that prevents weed seeds from germinating. This pre-emergent action allows crops and desired plants to grow without competition from invasive weeds. 

Its active chemical compound, dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate, is highly effective in controlling weeds such as pigweed, lambs' quarters, and crabgrass.

Applications in Agriculture and Landscaping

Dacthal has been widely applied to crops like vegetables, fruits, and ornamental plants. Its versatility in both commercial agriculture and residential landscaping has contributed to its popularity. 

Homeowners and landscapers have also used it extensively in managing weeds in lawns and garden beds.

Concerns Over Persistence

While Dacthal has been marketed as a reliable herbicide, its chemical persistence in the environment has raised red flags. 

Studies have shown that Dacthal and its breakdown products can remain in soil and water systems for years, leading to contamination of groundwater and drinking water supplies. These findings have driven the EPA to take regulatory action to mitigate its risks.

Why Did the EPA Issue a Stop Order?

The EPA’s decision to issue an emergency stop order for Dacthal is rooted in a combination of public health concerns, environmental damage, and regulatory lapses. 

This drastic measure reflects the agency’s commitment to addressing the herbicide’s growing risks.

Contamination of Drinking Water Supplies

One of the primary reasons for the stop order is the contamination of drinking water by Dacthal and its byproducts. As the herbicide breaks down, it produces persistent organic compounds that seep into groundwater and surface water. 

These residues are difficult to remove during water treatment and have been detected in drinking water supplies across various regions.

Studies have linked Dacthal exposure to several health concerns, including:

  • Respiratory Issues: Individuals exposed to Dacthal during application have reported respiratory irritation and difficulty breathing.
  • Carcinogenic Potential: Evidence suggests that Dacthal may be a carcinogen, with long-term exposure potentially increasing the risk of cancer.
  • Endocrine Disruption: Exposure to Dacthal has been associated with hormonal imbalances, which can affect reproductive health and development.

In addition, Dacthal’s persistence in the environment poses significant risks to ecosystems. Contaminated water systems harm aquatic life, including fish and amphibians, and disrupt the delicate balance of ecosystems. Residues in soil also reduce its fertility and long-term viability for agriculture.

By issuing the stop order, the EPA seeks to prevent further harm while reassessing the herbicide’s safety and environmental impact.

Health and Environmental Risks Associated with Dacthal

Dacthal’s risks extend beyond its immediate applications, affecting human health and the environment in profound ways.

Human Health Risks

Dacthal exposure can occur through inhalation, skin contact, or ingestion of contaminated water. Common health issues reported by individuals exposed to Dacthal include:

  • Short-Term Effects: Eye irritation, respiratory discomfort, and skin rashes.
  • Chronic Health Conditions: Prolonged exposure has been linked to liver and kidney damage, as well as potential carcinogenic effects.
  • Cancer Risks: Studies suggest that Dacthal’s byproducts may increase the risk of cancers such as lymphoma and leukemia, raising concerns about its long-term safety.

Environmental Impact

The herbicide’s environmental footprint is significant, with effects that ripple through ecosystems:

  • Water Contamination: Dacthal residues persist in groundwater and surface water, threatening drinking water supplies and aquatic habitats.
  • Soil Degradation: Persistent residues reduce soil health, affecting crop productivity and biodiversity.
  • Impact on Wildlife: Aquatic life, including fish and amphibians, suffer from exposure to Dacthal’s toxic byproducts, which disrupt reproductive cycles and food chains.

These risks underscore the need for stringent regulatory measures like the EPA’s stop order.

Who Is Affected by the EPA’s Emergency Stop Order?

The EPA’s emergency stop order impacts a broad spectrum of stakeholders, from agricultural producers to residential users and beyond.

Farmers and Agricultural Businesses

Farmers who relied on Dacthal to control weeds now face the challenge of finding alternative herbicides. This transition may lead to increased costs, reduced crop yields, and logistical complications. For specialty crop producers, such as those growing fruits and vegetables, the loss of Dacthal is particularly disruptive.

Landscapers and Residential Users

Landscapers and homeowners who used Dacthal for lawn care and landscaping must now seek alternative solutions. These users may incur additional expenses to replace Dacthal with safer products.

Communities Affected by Contamination

Communities near agricultural areas or water sources contaminated by Dacthal residues face significant risks. Residents relying on groundwater for drinking may be directly exposed to harmful byproducts, posing long-term health risks.

Regulators and Government Agencies

Local and state agencies tasked with monitoring environmental health are now responsible for addressing contamination and enforcing compliance with the EPA’s stop order. These efforts require substantial resources and coordination.

The stop order’s ripple effects highlight the interconnectedness of agricultural practices, environmental health, and public safety.

Legal Recourse for Victims of Dacthal Use

For individuals and communities harmed by Dacthal, pursuing legal action may be an option to seek accountability and compensation.

Victims may file lawsuits under several legal theories:

  • Personal Injury: Individuals who suffered health issues, such as cancer or organ damage, due to Dacthal exposure can file personal injury claims.
  • Property Damage: Property owners whose land or water sources were contaminated by Dacthal may seek compensation for cleanup costs and reduced property value.
  • Environmental Cleanup Costs: Communities burdened by widespread contamination may file claims to recover the costs of remediation and restoration.

Building a strong case requires thorough documentation, including:

  • Proof of Dacthal application or exposure.
  • Medical records linking health conditions to Dacthal exposure.
  • Environmental testing reports indicating contamination.

A lawyer experienced in environmental or product liability cases can guide victims through the legal process, ensuring that their claims are well-supported and filed within applicable deadlines.

What Happens After the Stop Order?

The EPA’s stop order sets in motion several regulatory and enforcement actions aimed at mitigating the risks associated with Dacthal.

  • Suspension of Sales and Use: The stop order prohibits the sale, distribution, and application of Dacthal. Businesses and individuals must comply immediately to avoid penalties.
  • Enforcement Actions: The EPA may impose fines or other penalties on parties that violate the stop order. It may also require manufacturers to conduct further safety studies or contribute to cleanup efforts.
  • Implications for Manufacturers: Dacthal’s manufacturers may face increased scrutiny and potential legal liability for harm caused by their product. The stop order could also prompt broader investigations into their safety practices and compliance with regulations.
  • For Consumers and Businesses: Individuals and businesses affected by the stop order must transition to alternative products and practices. This shift requires careful planning to minimize disruption and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

How a Lawyer Can Help in Dacthal-Related Cases

Navigating the legal complexities of Dacthal-related claims can be challenging, but a lawyer provides essential support for victims seeking justice.

  • Case Evaluation: A lawyer begins by assessing the details of the case, including the extent of harm, evidence of Dacthal exposure, and potential legal theories.
  • Evidence Collection: Building a strong case requires gathering documentation such as medical records, environmental testing reports, and proof of Dacthal use.
  • Negotiation and Representation: Lawyers advocate for victims during settlement negotiations and, if necessary, represent them in court. Their goal is to secure fair compensation for damages.
  • Contingency Fee Arrangements: Many lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, making legal representation accessible by requiring payment only if compensation is awarded.

The Burden of Proof in Dacthal-Related Claims

In any legal case involving harm caused by Dacthal, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff. 

This means that the individual or group bringing the claim must provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that Dacthal or its use directly caused their injuries, damages, or losses. 

Understanding the burden of proof is critical for building a strong case, as it directly impacts the success of the claim.

Key Elements to Prove

To meet the burden of proof in Dacthal-related claims, plaintiffs generally need to establish the following elements:

  1. Exposure to Dacthal
    Plaintiffs must show that they were directly or indirectly exposed to Dacthal. Evidence could include records of pesticide application in their area, documentation of contaminated water sources, or proof of their proximity to areas where Dacthal was used. This establishes the link between the plaintiff and the herbicide.
  2. Harm or Damage
    Plaintiffs must demonstrate that they suffered specific harm or damages as a result of Dacthal exposure. This can include:
    • Health issues such as cancer, respiratory problems, or organ damage.
    • Property damage due to soil or water contamination.
    • Financial losses from medical bills, cleanup costs, or lost income.
  3. Causation
    Establishing causation is often the most challenging part of meeting the burden of proof. Plaintiffs must show that their harm or damages were directly caused by Dacthal exposure, rather than other factors. Expert testimony from medical professionals, toxicologists, or environmental scientists is often critical in proving causation.
  4. Negligence or Misconduct by the Defendant
    Plaintiffs must also demonstrate that the defendant—such as Dacthal’s manufacturer, distributor, or applicator—was negligent or engaged in misconduct. This could involve failing to provide adequate warnings, misrepresenting the safety of the product, or improperly applying the herbicide in a way that caused harm.

Evidence to Support a Claim

Successfully proving a claim requires comprehensive evidence, which may include:

  • Medical Records: Detailed documentation of health conditions linked to Dacthal exposure, including diagnoses, treatment plans, and expert opinions from healthcare providers.
  • Environmental Testing: Reports showing the presence of Dacthal residues or its breakdown products in soil, water, or air samples collected from the affected area.
  • Property and Financial Records: Evidence of property damage, reduced land value, or financial losses incurred due to contamination or health issues.
  • Witness Statements and Documentation: Testimonies from witnesses who can confirm the use or application of Dacthal, as well as records of pesticide purchases or usage logs.
  • Expert Testimony: Input from toxicologists, environmental scientists, and medical experts who can explain how Dacthal exposure caused the plaintiff’s injuries or damages.

Challenges in Proving a Claim

Defendants in Dacthal-related cases may attempt to challenge the plaintiff’s evidence, often arguing that:

  • Other factors, such as pre-existing conditions or exposure to different chemicals caused the harm.
  • The plaintiff cannot definitively link their injuries or damages to Dacthal.
  • The use of Dacthal complied with existing regulations, and any harm was unforeseeable.

Plaintiffs must counter these arguments with strong, well-documented evidence and a clear narrative connecting Dacthal exposure to the harm suffered.

Ready to Seek Justice for Dacthal-Related Harm?

The EPA’s emergency stop order on Dacthal is a critical step toward addressing the risks posed by this widely used herbicide. Legal action provides a pathway to compensation and accountability for individuals and communities harmed by Dacthal exposure.

If you or your community has been affected by Dacthal, acting quickly is essential. Contact Lawsuits.com by calling (888) 984-6195 for a free case evaluation and connect with a lawyer who can guide you through the legal process. 

You can protect your rights, recover damages, and contribute to a safer, healthier environment by taking action.

Call Now 888-984-6195

Get Legal Advice

Related Lawsuits

  • Tepezza Lawsuit
  • Roundup Lawsuit
  • NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit
  • AFFF Lawsuit
  • Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit
  • Paraquat Lawsuit
  • Ozempic Lawsuit
  • Hair Relaxer Lawsuit
  • Depo Provera Lawsuit 
  • MegaDyne Electrode Lawsuit
  • Mesothelioma and Asbestosis Lawsuit
  • Omegle Lawsuit
  • Side effects of Talcum Powder Exposure
  • Who Is Eligible for the Tepezza Lawsuit?
  • Who Is Eligible for the Suboxone Lawsuit?
  • Who Is Eligible for the Ozempic Lawsuit?
  • Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit
  • Social Media Lawsuits Against Instagram
  • Social Media Lawsuits Against TikTok
  • Social Media Lawsuits Against Facebook
  • Side effects of Taxotere
  • Hernia Mesh Lawsuit
  • One Wheel Lawsuit
  • Rybelsus Lawsuit
  • Saxenda Lawsuit
  • California Wildfires Lawsuit
  • Texas Wildfires Lawsuit
  • Social Media Addiction Lawsuit
  • Hazing Abuse Lawsuit
  • Xarelto Lawsuit Lawyer
  • Xarelto Lawsuit Lawyer
  • Zepbound Lawsuit Lawyer
  • Weygovy Lawsuit Lawyer
  • Veozah Lawsuit Lawyer
  • Trulicity Lawsuit Lawyer
  • Silicosis Lawsuits
  • Hurricane Helene Lawsuits

Get Legal Advice

Book a Free Consultation

Get the Support Your Family Deserves

If a dangerous drug or defective product harmed you or someone you love, you deserve strong advocacy and support. Our experienced legal team has the resources to fight for your rights and secure the compensation essential to your family’s future.

Book a Free Consultation
lawsuits.com logo

Attorney Advertising. Lawsuits.com LLC is a national marketing network of law firms, including Helm Law Group, LLC, which are licensed to be part of Lawsuits.com and separately operate in states where they are each licensed. Lawsuits.com LLC is a legal marketing company. James Helm (Helm Law Group, LLC) is licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania and Arizona. Helm Law Group, LLC maintains at least joint responsibility for each client file, and most cases are referred to Lawsuit.com LLC’s network of attorneys across the country for principal responsibility. Lawsuits.com works with a select group of law firms around the country via referral/licensing agreements. See the firm and contact information for the attorneys responsible for the content of Lawsuits.com advertisements in each applicable state on our disclaimers page.

Navigation

  • Active Lawsuits
  • Contact
  • Search

Active Lawsuits

  • AFFF Lawsuit Lawyer
  • Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Lawyer
  • NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit lawyer (May 2025)
  • Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyer
  • Paraquat Lawsuit Lawyer
  • Roundup Lawsuit lawyer
  • Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawyer
  • Tepezza Lawsuit Lawyer

© 2025 Nationwide Mass Tort and Class Action Lawsuits | All rights reserved. Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Sitemap